Interconnection queue
Queue position, study phase, and a realistic in-service date compared with the one in the model.
Power and site-risk diligence
Independent power and site-risk reports for data-center lenders.
The gap
Lenders now verify the GPUs and the cash flow. But nobody independently checks whether power will be delivered on schedule and stay available, and a data center without power is a building.
What we check
Queue position, study phase, and a realistic in-service date compared with the one in the model.
Contracted megawatts versus announced megawatts, including ramp schedules and conditions precedent.
Equipment lead times and upgrade dependencies that set the real energization date.
What is built, what is permitted, and how long it can carry the load if the grid can’t.
How often the site could be asked to reduce load during grid stress, and what that means for availability.
How it works
A written report on each risk area, with sources, open questions, and the dates that matter to your draw schedule and covenants.
After close, we watch queue positions, regulatory filings, and project timelines, and flag changes that affect when power arrives or how reliable it will be.
Who it’s for
Underwrite construction and term loans with an independent view of power timing.
Understand the power assumptions behind the collateral before and after issuance.
Add a focused power and grid workstream alongside your technical review.
See delay and availability exposure that drives business-interruption risk.
Coming soon
A redacted example of a pre-close site report will be available here.
Request a pilot
Tell us about a project or site you’re evaluating. We’ll follow up to scope a pilot report.